This article is an on -site version of our inside politics newsletter. Subscribers can register here To have the newsletter delivered every day during the week. If you are not subscribed, you can still receive the newsletter Free for 30 days
Good morning. The Labor government has concluded a limited agreement with Donald Trump on trade, guaranteeing reductions in punitive prices on car exports and steel, but which cannot reverse a 10% tax that applies to most goods. Some reflections on the wider policy of it below.
Inside Politics is published by Georgina Quach. Follow Stephen on Bluesky And Xand Georgina on Bluesky. Read the previous edition of The newsletter here. Please send gossip, thoughts and comments to insidepolitics@ft.com
Count to come
From the point of view of the Labor Government, the most important and most important thing in the agreement that the British government has concluded with Donald Trump is that he offers considerable relief For Jaguar Land Rover of Trump prices. Perhaps other countries will get a better deal by settling down later than the United Kingdom, or not at all, but the company has been most suspended from additional 25% tariffs on the cars and metals that had previously been set by the Trump administration:
British steel and aluminum exports are now said to be zero for prices, according to the British government, while the first 100,000 British cars sold in the United States each year – the vast majority of the total – are subject to a decrease of 10%.
The ghost at the party here is the USMCA, the agreement that Donald Trump concluded with Canada and Mexico during his first mandate. Now he considers this affair as inadequate and pursues an aggressive land of land against his two immediate neighbors.
The biggest problem with this agreement from the point of view of the United Kingdom, however, is not that Trump can give it up. The success in negotiations with Trump leaves the government poorly equipped to prepare British taxpayers for new tax increases or spending discounts in November, while one is essentially guaranteed to follow in this year's budget. Just as important, this means that no one asks if the British government could better hold fire to obtain an agreement that includes alleviation for pharmaceutical products, or whether government changes to the “non-DOM” tax regime should now rethink that so many wealthy Americans seek to escape Trump America.
Students aged 16 to 19 are invited to participate in the FT school blogs competition in partnership with the Political Studies Association and Shoutout UK by May 25. The winner and two finalists, if the United Kingdom, can go to a parliamentary event “Have I Got News for You” in which I am a panelist. Details here.
Now try this
I go to the photos to see Sinners. Anyway, spend a wonderful weekend!
The best stories today
-
Go finance me | The main fund directors have Warned at a meeting on rue Downing This feeling towards the London stock market is at “Rock Bottom” and urged ministers to consider imposing pension funds in the United Kingdom to allocate at least 5% of their investments in national shares.
-
Cars, cows, cultures | The leaders of the United States and the United Kingdom welcomed the commercial pact signed between the two parties on Thursday as a “historic”, but the experts warned that it still left the United Kingdom against higher prices on the United States than before Donald Trump takes office. Here are the winners and the losers.
-
Warrington has 1.9 billion pounds sterling indebted | The ministers will send a team of experts to Warrington advice charged with debt After government inspectors warned that its high -risk loan and investment strategy was used to avoid making “transformational” savings.
-
'Colleagues . . . Let it tear well-being ' | Keir Starmer will be warned that he was facing his greatest rebellion to date As up to a quarter of his parliamentary party has raised concerns about the reductions in disability benefits, reports the Times. More than 80 labor deputies have signed a private letter exposing their concerns about the scale and the rate of social protection cuts.