Letters to the publisher: the answer to clean energy problems “is a better policy, no more pollution”

by admin
Letters to the publisher: the answer to clean energy problems "is a better policy, no more pollution"

To the publisher: The writer contributing Joel Kotkin argues that California is harming by pushing renewable energies while leaving oil and gas in the soil (“The high cost of green energy policies from California”, “ May 7). But that is like saying that a smoker hurts when leaving too early. The real damage comes from the continuation of the burning of fossil fuels, which cause forest fires, heat waves and drought through the state.

According to the latest annual study of California clean jobsClean energy already employs approximately 545,000 Californians – much more than the fossil fuels – and these jobs increase more quickly. Yes, clean energy must be more fair, but the answer is a better policy, no more pollution. Let us not forget that low -income families are more affected by pollution and climate change.

Kotkin also says that California's efforts do not have much impact, but ignore the fact that we are not alone. The EU, Canada, Japan, South Korea and dozens of American states have ambitious objectives of renewable energy and climate. The global transition is already underway. California leadership helps stimulate this momentum, reduce world prices and shape politics worldwide.

Brent Jacobson, Chino Hills

..

To the editor: Kotkin does not conveniently mention how the price of solar panels and the storage of the electricity battery has been falling in recent years. It's beautiful. And if the recent past is a guide, the collapse of prices is not about to stop.

As a Bill McKibben ecologist Once reminded us“We live on a planet where the cheapest means of producing power is to point a glass of glass in the sun.” The result is a “miracle in the water-vin”. Coal, oil and natural gas are all history.

Peter L. Coye, Pomona

..

To the editor: Nowhere in Kotkin's article mentions the cost of doing nothing. The price so as not to eliminate fossil fuels and build a renewable economy is more important: more devastating fires, hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, systemic ecological collapse, warming of oceans – basically, an unlivable planet.

JJ Flowers, Dana Point

Source Link

You may also like

Leave a Comment