Justin Baldoni's lawyer tears publicist Stephanie Jones, his lawyers applaud

Justin Baldoni accelerates his legal war with the publicist Stéphanie Jones … the woman whom her lawyer blames having sparked the Baldoni set and Blake Lively drama.

Justin's lawyer, Bryan FreedmanI have just submitted a modified set of reconvention requests against Stephanie … legally repelled after the lawyers of Jones were “additional” to speak to Billy Bush About his side of duel prosecution.

Freedman also castigated Jones in a statement to TMZ, telling us … “In the light of new evidence that is discovered almost daily, it has become imperative to modify our reconventional requests against Stephanie Jones and JonesWorks. We are not at all surprised that Mrs. Jones asked Sleuths online.”

Justin's lawyer continues … “A superficial reading of the” Van-Sham “trial clearly shows that the animated parties were taken by engaging in their own smear campaign, intentionally by clearly inappropriate ends by creating a wacky complaint with an unrelated attempt and no defendant, not, ordered to not informed.

Freedman adds … “To suggest – as Vanzan (Lively and Reynolds) do in their secret” complaint ” – that they do not know the identity of their own employees and contractual counterparts is a complete joke. We are just starting to scratch the surface of a much larger and more insidious diagram.

To be clear, Jones and Jonesworks are also involved in this fault. We reiterate once again that there is no and never had a smear campaign, with the exception of the one led by the animated parties and Ms. Jones in collaboration with the New York Times. “”

He concludes … “We will continue the fight to exhibit and hold the criminal and discover the truth responsible.”

Meanwhile, Stephanie's lawyer Maaren Shah Said to TMZ … “This case will be decided on the mountain of evidence which demonstrate Wayfarer Studios and Ms. Abel deliberately violated her contracts with Jonesworks, which the defendants have not visibly refused.”

She continued … “The weak attempt of defendants to face their own case against Ms. Jones represents nothing more than some theories of the demystified conspiracy and media gadgets which have no basis in fact or in proof. The undeniable fact remains: defendants must still provide a substantial defense to the case of Ms. Jones. Everything else is only distraction and noise.”