In a case of paternity and child alimony which becomes more controversial by the week, the phenomenon of Minnesota Timberwolves Anthony Edwards makes a legal explosion on his ex-girlfriend Ayesha Howard. In recently deposited court documents, Edwards accuses Howard of manipulative behavior and tries to deceive the court by using an ovulation tracker as a tool to guarantee financial assistance.
The 22-year-old basketball phenomenon now asks a judge to sanction Howard for what he describes as a blatant and disturbing abuse of the judicial system. The controversy surrounding Howard is his attempt to reopen a case of child alimony in California despite a previous decision that the State has no competence on the case.
Edwards claims that California has no competence and accuses Howard of forum purchases to improve financial results
Edwards and his lawyers respond to Howard's request to repeat an already decided case, which ordered California not to have a position in their child alimony. Edwards says that Howard’s attempt to transfer the case to another state is only strategic forum purchases, a maneuver intended to obtain a more favorable monetary decision.
His lawyers allege that there is no factual or legal basis for California to be part of the case. Edwards claims that he and Howard had no sexual intercourse in California and also claims that she did not present credible evidence there.
Edwards' lawyer said she had no signed lease, no public service bills and no reliable evidence that she lives or works in California. His only contacts with the state are part of a bad faith program to manipulate the system and deceive the court to obtain a child alimony order in California.
The judge has already rejected Howard's jurisdiction of competence, but his last request seems to be an ambitious attempt to cancel the decision and transfer the case under Californian law, which allows much more generous child alimony determinations.
The NBA star explodes Howard for testifying with Ovulation Tracker as proof, the appellant being part of a “planned financial decision”
The most inflammatory part of the recent Edwards deposit may be his response to the Tax Deposit of a ovulation calendar. The file, which was submitted in the hope of justifying its allegations concerning the moment of conception, has become the centerpiece of Edwards' assertion that Howard's pregnancy was always motivated by money.
His lawyers blame him to have a premeditated plan to become pregnant with the future feeling of basketball. The deposit considers its actions a premeditated money maneuver and indicates that the use of the tracker paints a very disturbing image of his motivations.
She was not a woman who was taken from her guard with an unexpected pregnancy, said Edwards lawyer. She is a woman who has meticulously planned her fertility cycle and chose her partner for her fame and her money potential. This raises disturbing questions about Ayesha's motivations and its credibility.
According to Edwards, the use by Howard of the ovulation tracker as proof is manipulative and reflects a broader trend of practices contrary to ethics and dishonest.
Edwards accuses Howard of having abused the legal system with recycled complaints and misleading evidence
In his brief, Edwards does not play well. He declares that Howard simply reallocated the problems that have already been resolved and try to receive a different result by making the same arguments in different labels.
The parties presented their business and the court ruled, according to the memory. Ayesha was not satisfied with the result and is now trying to get a second bite to the apple.
Edwards' lawyers argue that this is not only a case of a decision of paternity or a motion for child alimony. It is a question of defining a precedent on what the judicial system will tolerate with regard to driving. They argue that Howard abuses the judicial process, wasting the judicial time and promoted a story based on disinformation.
Frustrated by what he considers an ongoing legal posture and deliberate deception, Edwards now seeks the court to officially sanction Howard. His conduct is a blatant and sustained abusive use of the judicial process, claim his lawyers, who intends to ratify the money in the situation.
If assigned, the request for sanction would be extremely expensive and legally harmful to Howard. The sanctions are only taken by the court when the court finds one of the litigants in bad faith, providing false or non -relevant information, or error in error in error. Edwards has now deposited all these charges at Howard's feet.
To date, the judge has not ruled on the request for sanctions. However, the fact that the request was requested in the first place suggests that this case is heading towards much wicked and more contradictory waters.
A children's support dispute that becomes a full -fledged legal circus
This started as a disagreement of routine concerning child alimony has become a pure and simple legal soap opera involving personal accusations, jurisdictional wars and accusations of financial tablets. Edwards, whose career was booming with the Minnesota Timberwolves and which was one of the faces of the American team's basketball, is now in the middle of a battle of open and very personal lawyers.
Howard made no comments from the public concerning the latest accusations, including the assertion that his pregnancy was part of a premeditated model program. Nor did she respond to Edwards' assertion that her link with California is staged for legal purposes.
The judge has not yet made his judgment on the request for sanctions, the public is glued to this current show, which continues to blur the line between the big titles of the trial and the deeply intimate grievances.
Connect yourself, because if this petition is something to judge, the next episode of this soap opera will be full of theaters.
The post Anthony Edwards accuses baby mom of “trapping” him with a pregnancy plan using an ovulation tracker appeared first on Where is the buzz | Latest news, entertainment, exclusive interviews and more.
