The first primatologist explains why 100 men vs 1 Combat gorilla would not occur

A first primatologist tries to bring a reason in the hundred men against One Gorilla Debate … explaining the main reason why a fight like this would not take place – and argue that it paints these beautiful creatures in a bad light.

We talked with Michael Stern – The former Primates Curator at the Philadelphia Zoo with years of experience in the study of gorillas both in captivity and in nature in Uganda – and, he tells us that the main reason why this debate is so silly is because a gorilla would look around, to see that it was in number and take off.

Stern says it is the equivalent of asking if a unicorn could shoot a dinosaur – or if a shark with a laser beam could explode a submarine!

The gorilla would realize that it was in a bad place, and probably sprinkled through the nearest men's line … by overthrowing one or two on the side while trying to run for that – no war for the Planet of the Apes here. Sorry, Chris Pontius – It looks like you are wrong on this one.

Michael explains the reason why people are so in this debate is because of the speed and strength of gorillas – and, he admits that they are super strong creatures … But they are milder giants than ferocious soldiers, and all this speech is really damaging to their representative.

For a primate that could in fact do damage to a group of men, Michael says that no further seeks than chimpanzee … several of which have attacked humans in the past.

Michael also told us about the New Nature Foundation – an organization of which he is a part seeks to stop deforestation in Africa through a variety of new technologies – in case People actually want to help primates instead of discussing their sense of fighting. Listen and see their website for more information.